Onshore Wellsite Facilities September 8-9, 2026

This event reminder is brought to you by: Tuboscope, leaders in high performance internal coatings built to protect tubulars in harsh operating environments

Internal Coatings Of OCTG

Achieving Greater Efficiency Under Infrastructure Constraints Cutting Cost And Tightening Execution As Power, Gas & Water Bottlenecks Intensify 8 & 9 September 2026

Simplification To Balance Cost With Risk, Whilst Addressing Key Constraints
What Is Actually Working In The Field To Improve Margins?

An event designed for VPs and Heads of Upstream Assets and Facilities as well as supervisors and engineers – this initiative is designed to help operators lower operating costs, improve facility efficiency, strengthen power reliability, and manage growing infrastructure constraints — without slowing production growth or adding unnecessary complexity.
As water disposal pressures, gas takeaway limitations, aging infrastructure, leaner teams, and tighter capital discipline continue to collide, facilities leaders are being forced to rethink how assets are operated, streamlined, expanded, and supported in 2026.
Through practical operator-led discussions, this event will help you benchmark how peers are simplifying brownfield complexity, improving infrastructure performance, reducing operational friction, managing reliable power, and ensuring automation and measurement investments are delivering measurable operational outcomes — not just more systems to manage.
Most importantly, the event is built around what is actually working in the field to improve margins, maintain reliability, and support disciplined growth under increasingly demanding operating conditions.

Research Insights — Why Facilities Strategy Is Back At The Centre Of The Permian Conversation

Over the last several weeks we conducted more than 40 in-depth research conversations with upstream operators — large, medium, and small — across the Permian Basin, Eagle Ford, and other onshore oil-producing regions across North America.

Irrespective of operator size, the same operational pressures and trade-offs surfaced repeatedly:

  • Power reliability
  • Gas and water takeaway constraints
  • Inherited brownfield complexity
  • Infrastructure fragmentation
  • Contractor execution quality
  • Lean workforce structures
  • Electrification uncertainty
  • Growing pressure to simplify operations without losing future flexibility

Many operators are now managing facilities infrastructure shaped by acquisitions, temporary workarounds, shifting production priorities, and years of incremental modifications layered on top of one another.

At the same time, facilities teams are under increasing pressure to:

  • improve reliability and efficiency
  • reduce operational complexity
  • lower operating cost
  • modernise infrastructure
  • maintain production flexibility
  • and execute faster with leaner organisations

…all whilst operating under tighter capital discipline and greater pressure to deliver predictable operational performance.

More or less every operator we spoke to ultimately came back to the same core challenge:

How do you execute more effectively under tighter operational and financial conditions — without creating new infrastructure, reliability, or workforce risks elsewhere in the system?

That question now sits at the centre of facilities strategy across North America — forming the lens through which this year’s agenda explores key issues such as power reliability, execution quality, infrastructure simplification, brownfield optimisation, electrification ROI, and operational flexibility.

Reliable Power Remains A Major Strategic Facilities Issue In 2026 – What Are The Latest Approaches For Different Situations? And What Does ROI Look Like On The Earlier Investment Decisions?  

As operators increase reliance on electrified systems and grid-connected infrastructure, power availability itself is increasingly becoming a constraint — particularly as production systems become more interconnected and operational downtime becomes less tolerable.

At the same time, many operators are now entering the phase where they can finally evaluate whether electrification strategies initiated several years ago are genuinely delivering the operational and financial returns originally expected.

Operators are increasingly asking:

  • Did reliability improve as planned?
  • Were operating costs actually reduced?
  • Did complexity simply move elsewhere in the system?
  • And how should electrification strategies evolve moving forward?

To address this, multiple sessions throughout the conference focus on:

  • real-world power reliability lessons
  • electrification ROI
  • unstable grid conditions
  • rental generation dependence
  • brownfield electrical constraints
  • field execution challenges
  • and long-term infrastructure flexibility

Portfolio Optimisation Is Becoming Just As Important As Individual Asset Performance

One of the clearest conclusions from the research process was that facility performance is once again becoming central to profitability, operational predictability, and future competitiveness.

Facilities strategy can no longer be separated into either expansion or rationalisation. In many cases, operators are now having to pursue both at the same time across different parts of the asset base.

The case studies will help you determine how to adapt or upgrade  facilities systems that are:

  • efficient without becoming rigid
  • simplified without losing visibility
  • scalable without becoming overbuilt
  • standardised without creating operational inflexibility
  • and resilient without creating unnecessary cost

 

That balancing act now sits at the centre of this year’s agenda.

Day One begins with a broader portfolio-wide optimisation perspective focused on how operators are responding to the changing realities of 2026 across both large central facilities and remote sites — not simply at an individual asset level.

Throughout the conference, operators will compare:

  • where integration strategies are succeeding 
  • where rationalisation efforts are struggling 
  • how brownfield infrastructure is being  streamlined 
  • and how facilities decisions are increasingly shaping wider operational and financial performance 

Cost Reduction And Execution Quality Are Becoming Increasingly Interconnected

Operators repeatedly told us that the pressure to lower operating cost can no longer be separated from broader discussions around:

  • workforce structure
  • automation
  • infrastructure simplification
  • operational visibility
  • reliability
  • and execution quality

Sometimes the challenge is about efficiency.

Increasingly, however, it is about reducing cost whilst still protecting:

  • uptime
  • production continuity
  • operational reliability
  • workforce effectiveness
  • and safety

Whether discussing contractor performance, workforce capability, instrumentation reliability, the actionability of automation investments, or simplifying inherited operational complexity, operators are increasingly focused on improving execution consistency without creating new operational risks elsewhere across the asset base.

That is why this years agenda places such strong emphasis on practical operational learning and peer exchange across different site situations and use cases  — helping attendees benchmark:

  • What is actually working in the field for different scenarios 
  • Where execution failures are emerging 
  • How operators are improving consistency 
  • And where complexity reduction is genuinely delivering measurable operational benefit 

Hear How Your Peers Are Addressing The “Temporary Infrastructure” Problem

One of the strongest new themes emerging from the research conversations was the issue of temporary infrastructure quietly becoming increasingly expensive permanent infrastructure.

Whether relating to:

  • water takeaway systems
  • compression arrangements
  • temporary power solutions
  • rental generation
  • or brownfield temporary solutions made during and  after COVID

…many operators acknowledged that stopgap solutions are now deeply embedded into day-to-day operations.

The challenge is that improving reliability, lowering operating cost, and simplifying infrastructure increasingly require consolidation and rationalisation of these inherited layers of complexity.

Yet very few operators — whether large or mid-sized — believe they have fully solved this problem.

Most described it as an ongoing work in progress.

As a result, several discussions throughout the conference focus specifically on:

  • brownfield rationalisation
  • phased infrastructure upgrades
  • consolidation priorities
  • infrastructure simplification strategies
  • and how to reduce complexity without introducing  new operational risk

Across North America, facilities simplification is increasingly becoming a major strategic priority rather than simply an operational clean-up exercise.

Standardization Is A Huge Opportunity — But Overstandardization Creates Its Own Risks

Standardization repeatedly surfaced as one of the industry’s biggest opportunities for:

  • reducing complexity
  • lowering cost
  • improving repeatability
  • simplifying maintenance
  • and accelerating execution

Hear directly from operators about:

  • where standardization is creating measurable  operational value
  • where local realities are forcing deviation from  standard models
  • and how facilities teams are balancing  simplification with long-term flexibility and resilience

Across two days of sessions, discussions, and peer exchange, the agenda is designed to help operators benchmark what is working, where risks are emerging, what strategies are proving scalable, and how others are approaching the difficult trade-offs now shaping facilities’ performance across North America’s onshore oil-producing regions.

We appreciate everyone who contributed insight throughout the research process, and we look forward to welcoming many of you this September.

Addressing The 2026 Power Reliability, Gas Handling & Water Disposal Hot Topics

Power reliability is now influencing facility strategy itself. 

Operators told us that temporary generation solutions originally introduced as short-term bridging measures are increasingly becoming semi-permanent operating models — often carrying higher costs, operational complexity and growing reliability concerns. Others are evaluating modular generation, behind-the-meter self-generation, targeted infrastructure upgrades and emerging shared microgrid models as they attempt to balance operational flexibility with long-term infrastructure uncertainty.

At the same time, operators explained that water handling requirements are materially increasing power demand across facilities. More produced water transfer, automation, treatment, compression and pumping capacity are creating new operational dependencies between water infrastructure and power infrastructure. Across multiple discussions, facilities teams stressed that water management, gas handling and power reliability can no longer be planned independently.

Produced water constraints continue to shape operational strategy throughout parts of the Delaware Basin, while gas takeaway limitations remain a major source of uncertainty heading into late 2026.

Several operators described themselves as operating within a “murky middle” — uncertain whether to commit to permanent infrastructure, continue relying on rental generation, pursue modular solutions, or wait for expected pipeline and utility upgrades to materialize.

Current gas takeaway bottlenecks, negative Waha pricing pressure and delayed infrastructure expansion continue to reinforce this uncertainty across the region.

A major shift emerging this year is the increasingly sophisticated discussion around retrofitting mature Permian facilities for future gas growth, infrastructure variability and operational resilience — rather than continuing to design around historical oil-production assumptions alone.

Operators are now reassessing compression strategies, gas routing logic, voltage stability, backup generation requirements and facility redundancy models in ways that would have been considered secondary priorities only a few years ago.

Smaller and mid-sized operators, in particular, highlighted the growing tension between maintaining operational flexibility and controlling capital exposure. Many explained that rental dependency initially offered valuable flexibility, but becomes increasingly difficult to justify economically as infrastructure uncertainty persists. One of the most important operational questions now emerging across the basin is simple: when does temporary infrastructure effectively become permanent infrastructure?

Infrastructure constraints remains THE defining operational themes of 2026. While this is not a dedicated water management conference, the operational consequences of produced water disposal constraints, infrastructure sequencing challenges and regional utility limitations are now directly impacting facility strategy, maintenance planning, compression design, automation priorities and long-term growth planning.

At the same time, many operators continue integrating inherited or aging facilities into new operating models following acquisitions and portfolio restructuring. Even where growth ambitions remain modest, facilities teams are still being asked to improve reliability, maintain operational headroom and modernize infrastructure against a backdrop of constrained capital efficiency.

This year’s agenda has been designed specifically around these realities — bringing together practical operator experiences from regions facing the greatest infrastructure uncertainty, alongside discussions on power reliability, water dependency, gas takeaway limitations, operational flexibility, retrofit strategy and long-term facility resilience.